200w ago - According to Senior Director Susan Panico, Sony plans to introduce The Tester on PlayStation Network this month while VP Peter Dille has also hinted to IGN that more PS1 and PS2 classics are destined for PSN.
The Tester joins other original programming, such as PULSE and Qore, as the company looks to continue expanding its video content on the service.
To quote: "We've had a very different strategic approach by having our service offered for free," Panico said. "Offering a premium service someday that might make sense, but right now it's important to deliver a great array of digital content for free to help broaden PlayStation Network's access."
Dille stated, to quote: "From our side, we're going through our own studio organization and trying to make sure all these old games are out there so that we can lead by example, but we're also communicating with all the third-parties about the success of the Final Fantasy games, and other PS1 and PS2 classics.
By all means, I think people can look for more of that because once the third-parties see how this works, it's just found money. There's not a whole lot of work that has to go into it and once we can get it up on the network, it finds an audience pretty quickly."
Stay tuned for more PS3 Hacks and PS3 CFW news, follow us on Twitter and be sure to drop by the PS3 Hacks and PS3 Custom Firmware Forums for the latest PlayStation 3 scene updates and homebrew releases!
what ever you throw at it it should work. Who does not play dvd s in ps3. when you look at dealing with cords and cleaning up entertain ment system. One less machine is better. On top of that the wifi is convenient. so playing ps2 games on ps3 would be all around energy saver if you have external wifi adapter hooked into ps2 nick card.
I like not having a memory card. sticking out of machine. I never liked proprietory card on ps2. One more stupid purchase. I like the onboard memory cards on ps3. if it is built right it should be able to handle dvd games with out a sweat. Its commercials state it does every thing but b/c. I mean comn man. I do not see why sony does not give it other then reasons i already stated in prior post.
The way I see it and it may be because I'm in my productive cycle of life is if my ps3 breaks I go buy a new one. Its cheaper to replace a ps3 than to replace a huge collection of games, and even if you play a ps2 game on your ps3 as long as you are enjoying your machine to the fullest thats great. I wouldnt want to go buy a ps2 to play some games because now I have to have more consoles hooked up, besides its outdated.
The ps3 is cheap for the life it can give you as you call it, but your collection is more expensive and some of the games are hard to find. Another thing is the ps1 games that are bought off the psn store dont use the bluray drive so maybe the life of the console is wasting but not the Bluray drive. I my opinion its totally worth it having your reliable machine play whatever you throw in and knowing that if it breaks buying a new one will put a smile on your face.
I'm not thinking on that kind of costs, I mean, I'm not saying that it will cost more because you have to buy a NEW PS2 in order to play its games. What I'm trying to say is that it is more expensive to play PS2 games on a PS3 because of the usage: You'll see, let's say that you use thy PS3 to play PS2 games most of the time (just making my point, this might not be the case) and suddenly it breaks ... wouldn't it be better to replace a PS2 than a PS3? 'cause I really think so. Beside, why wasting PS3's "Lifetime" when you can use the one that a PS2 can give.
It's doesn't worth it, at least not for me, 'cause if I wanna play those games I only use my PS (The fat one ) and I just start playing ... giving, once again, my PS3 a little bit more of lifetime by using it what it was meant for : BlueRays!
But I guess that in the end, everyone can use their stuff the way it's more convenient for them ... just my two cents.
however, most people that are looking for ps2 b/c on the ps3 already own a ps3. therefore it wouldn't cost them anymore than the price of the game if they don't already own it. i know some people who traded in their ps2 to help them afford a ps3, so they would have to save up more money just to buy an "outdated" console.
to take the debate a step further, do you think they should take out the ps1 b/c also? how much does it cost to play a ps1 game on a ps3 vs playing a ps1 game on a ps1? ... totally not worth it? or is it?
Yep, I definitely agree with you, you're so right. But on the other hand, I don't see any good reason for having a PS2 emulator in a PS3, just make no sense to me, that is 'cause the same question always comes to my mind when I read anything about the issue:
How much does it cost to play a PS2 game on a PS3 VS playing a PS2 game on a PS2? ... Totally not worth it