Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13



  1. #11
    Contributor gemini420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    15
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    Quote Originally Posted by Subverter View Post
    As stated before when the lawsuit was filed, $ony can do what it wants. we agree to the user terms and agreements .. and we also have a choice u either upgrade the fw and loose OtherOS or keep OtherOS by not upgrading.

    when i bought both of my ps3 i bought it to be used as a gaming system if i want linux i can use a real pc. and just to answer the comment some will post " i paid $499.99 and now we loose OtherOs" its like anything else, when a device first comes out we pay extra $$ for this commodity soon the price drops like now ps3 cost $299.99, i say the extra $200.00 i paid "then" has well been worth it for all the gaming i've done, and i'm sure most will agree.
    Just because Sony wrote a EULA that covers their own butt (in every conceivable situation they could think of), does not mean that it will be legally upheld in court.

    You need to consider when you agreed to that EULA. Was it before you purchased (and opened PS3, and used the PS3)? No, it was afterward.

    Did you purchase the PS3 system based on Sony's advertised features? Yes.

    Does a manufacturer have the right (regardless of the manufacturers claims) to retroactively alter the product to remove advertised features? Courts will decide this, not the manufacturer ...

    Product manufacturers would love to take your money and then retroactively do what is in their own best interest. This is why there are consumer rights, and there are courts to uphold those rights.

    Normally, product manufacturers do not go down this path. But, Sony chose to do so. EULAs like this are rarely challenged in court.

    No questions asked, this is new ground. And could set a very scary precedent *if* Sony is allowed to disable advertised features as they choose. It will redefine the concept of 'purchased property'.

    No matter how you look at it, Sony is removing advertised features ...

    Choose to loose either ...

    A) Other OS

    or

    B) Network access, online play, to-be-released game titles, BluRay compatibility

    If Sony didn't purposefully prevent you from playing to-be-released game titles (by checking the OS version), then they may have more room to legally withhold online play and 'feature updates'.

    BUT forcing users to update (by requiring the OS update, in order to continue using the PS3 system for to-be-released game titles) is the crux of the issue.

  2. #12
    Senior Member clouduzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    141
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    B) Network access, online play, to-be-released game titles, BluRay compatibility

    If Sony didn't purposefully prevent you from playing to-be-released game titles (by checking the OS version), then they may have more room to legally withhold online play and 'feature updates'.

    BUT forcing users to update (by requiring the OS update, in order to continue using the PS3 system for to-be-released game titles) is the crux of the issue.

    Couldn't have said it better myself, that's why I'm glad the system is finally exploited now they will see how it feels to get screwed over! Not to mention when it was rumored that they were taking it away they flat out denied it and then did it anyway. So screw Sony

  3. #13
    Contributor nofunatall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    agreed. i think you are spot on gemini.

 

Sponsored Links

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Advertising - Affiliates - Contact Us - PS3 Downloads - Privacy Statement - Site Rules - Top - © 2014 PlayStation 3 News