A higher clock? I doubt it... seriously doubt it.
I would say the only thing they improved was the cost of manufacture that reduced a lot and the power consumption that will deliver a cooler version of the processor that will fit that tiny little cheap case the slim has. A higher clock would deliver a serious issue concerning new games being developed for slim debug ps3 and then not being able to run properly in older ps3s.
I would say the only thing they improved was the cost of manufacture that reduced a lot and the power consumption that will deliver a cooler version of the processor that will fit that tiny little cheap case the slim has. A higher clock would deliver a serious issue concerning new games being developed for slim debug ps3 and then not being able to run properly in older ps3s.
Quote:
|
A higher clock? I doubt it... seriously doubt it.
I would say the only thing they improved was the cost of manufacture that reduced a lot and the power consumption that will deliver a cooler version of the processor that will fit that tiny little cheap case the slim has. A higher clock would deliver a serious issue concerning new games being developed for slim debug ps3 and then not being able to run properly in older ps3s. |
Hang on.. isnt this the same Cell Processor they started using in the 40GB/80GB models? the only one i know that was using the 65nm chip was the original 60GB/20GB models... so technically this chip isnt so new.. but at least they are telling us that they guarantee the new Slim to also contain this chip.
Quote:
|
Hang on.. isnt this the same Cell Processor they started using in the 40GB/80GB models? the only one i know that was using the 65nm chip was the original 60GB/20GB models... so technically this chip isnt so new.. but at least they are telling us that they guarantee the new Slim to also contain this chip.
|
for the ps3, it means less power comsumption, less heat and a smaller cell chip, which is why they can make a slim now.
And i supose that there can not be any talk about increasing clock power - Sony need to think about older fat models also.
But remember - PS3 has never used its full-power yet. PPU (Power Processing Unit) is used on its safe-maximum. However, the number of SPUs (Synergatic Processing Unit) varies depending on game. (Max, if i remember correctly, was 5 using GTA5).
So even if they have increased processing power, it wouldn't matter for a year or two - there is no game that uses 6 or 7 SPUs yet. Another talk if Sony would have include CellX processor in PS3, which is 5 times faster then original Cell BE processor used in all PS3 models.
But remember - PS3 has never used its full-power yet. PPU (Power Processing Unit) is used on its safe-maximum. However, the number of SPUs (Synergatic Processing Unit) varies depending on game. (Max, if i remember correctly, was 5 using GTA5).
So even if they have increased processing power, it wouldn't matter for a year or two - there is no game that uses 6 or 7 SPUs yet. Another talk if Sony would have include CellX processor in PS3, which is 5 times faster then original Cell BE processor used in all PS3 models.
Still, from 90nm to 45nm and 350w to 250w, it isnt a bad reduction, and why would Sony include the CellX if they were trying to cut costs.
Quote:
|
Still, from 90nm to 45nm and 350w to 250w, it isnt a bad reduction, and why would Sony include the CellX if they were trying to cut costs.
|
What about CellX (PowerXCell), i sayed it, becouse they could have put it into new PS3, but it is expensive.
However it probably would be in PS4 - simple evolution. The processor itself is coded same way as Cell BE.























