http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&ei=uuu3SaOtJoGStQOL5-jyAQ&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=1&ct=result&cd=1&q=ign+biased&spell=1
your not the only one who thinks this
your not the only one who thinks this
it's true that other people think this, but i do not believe that IGN is biased because of the whole skate incident. That was actually legit. The main reason skate got a lower score was because the frame rate was of slightly lesser quality on the ps3. But like I said, IGN is biased towards the 360 vs the ps3, but none of their bias accusations have anything to do with incomplete reviews and flaming a company.
I totally agree with you. A few years ago IGN had okay reviewers but now... their reviews are wrote by people that know jack sh*t about video games, all their reviews are bloody crap.
Personally I don't care about Sonic, anymore still clinging to this blue hedgehog need to let go ffs, the reason Sonic games are still being made because people like YOU are still buying this crap so they are sitll making money. Face it mate Sonic died around 15 years ago.
But back to IGN, yeah IGN sucks my arse seriously I remember their review of Killzone 2 gameplay at E3 2008. Hahahahaha that moron that wrote that article got ripped so hard, god that was hilarious he must of got abused 100 times if not more XDD. He was saying the game was to bleak and gray, what was he expecting pink fluffy bunny rabbits and colourful flowers in a war?
Seriously IGN should just close down.
Personally I don't care about Sonic, anymore still clinging to this blue hedgehog need to let go ffs, the reason Sonic games are still being made because people like YOU are still buying this crap so they are sitll making money. Face it mate Sonic died around 15 years ago.
But back to IGN, yeah IGN sucks my arse seriously I remember their review of Killzone 2 gameplay at E3 2008. Hahahahaha that moron that wrote that article got ripped so hard, god that was hilarious he must of got abused 100 times if not more XDD. He was saying the game was to bleak and gray, what was he expecting pink fluffy bunny rabbits and colourful flowers in a war?
Seriously IGN should just close down.
Sonic games aren't still being made because of people like me. I never said that i bought the game. I just checked it out. To be honest, i just noticed this thing and decided to check it out. And i decided to leave it cause it wasn't a game i wanted to play.
But that doesnt mean that a dude who's job is to finish the damn game.
But back to the subject, the reason Sonic games are still being made is because the Genesis generation passed Sonic on to the younger generation, and SEGA sold out to the kids. The kids want to play Sonic because he's blue, he's spiky, and the story is on their level, and especially since the wii as easy controls, easy to play. Sonic's gone to crap because of the kids.
But that doesnt mean that a dude who's job is to finish the damn game.
But back to the subject, the reason Sonic games are still being made is because the Genesis generation passed Sonic on to the younger generation, and SEGA sold out to the kids. The kids want to play Sonic because he's blue, he's spiky, and the story is on their level, and especially since the wii as easy controls, easy to play. Sonic's gone to crap because of the kids.
What a load of tosh. How can you say a team that has dedicated ps3 reviewers are biased against the ps3!
They gave the god awful Resistance - Fall of man a 9.1 review for gods sake! At the end of the day, it comes down to the opinion of the reviewer, not IGN as a whole. Do you think the editor would say, nah, this is too pro ps3, knock it down a bit. If the reviewer think that overall a game is worth 3. whatever, so be it, chances are the game is probably rubbish, at least in their opinion.
They gave the god awful Resistance - Fall of man a 9.1 review for gods sake! At the end of the day, it comes down to the opinion of the reviewer, not IGN as a whole. Do you think the editor would say, nah, this is too pro ps3, knock it down a bit. If the reviewer think that overall a game is worth 3. whatever, so be it, chances are the game is probably rubbish, at least in their opinion.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by knotty
What a load of tosh. How can you say a team that has dedicated ps3 reviewers are biased against the ps3!
|
Either way, if Resistance was such a terrible game (Which i loved, but i enjoyed r2 more) why is it that people bought it and liked it, and then went out and made the second one a success? Resistance and Sonic are two different games, with different fan bases, age groups, etc. Comparing the two are ludicrous.
As for your comments about opinion, the opinion cannot be BIASED. it's true that they can believe that some games are awful when they actually aren't. But how can a proper opinion be placed if you haven't even finished the game? It's just not right.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by knotty
What a load of tosh. How can you say a team that has dedicated ps3 reviewers are biased against the ps3!
|
read before opening front hole on face.
Wii does not = PS3 so what motivated your post?
That sonic review REALLY turned me off IGN. It was very poorly written, and it read completely like a biased article. Granted, the game isn't that great anyway, but they took it way too far just because its not the Sonic game THEY wanted.
